answer? Big babies. Very big babbies.
Consider breast implants.
Some make fun of their artificiality, their
exaggerated size, their over-firm appearance and
But what if all those
gigantic tits, created and stretched out to the
bursting point are, from another perspective, not that
artificial at all.
Consider that gigantic
breasts are actually recreations of something seen
from that point of view. Stretched is the first
What could such
over-sized, man-made breasts be recreating? After all,
each tit is bigger than a man's head. That's the next
At that scale, they can
only be recreating mom's milk-stretched breasts, full
and firm, as seen from the perspective
The incredibly large sizes
are only understandable when viewed as imitating the
perspective of a new-born baby, looking up at that
giant source of mouth pleasure, with an approving
smile not far beyond.
With all those hungry men
in competition for the tit, is it surprising that
people disapprove of mothers feeding their babies from
the breast in public.
In an odd way, the breast is further sexualized
because this natural oral "perspective" is being
fantasized by men instead of being experienced by
Even more odd, women,
especially strippers whose breast skin is already
stretched to the bursting point by artificial
implants, are, in effect, handicapped from being
stretched further by milk in motherhood.
Those false milk sacs
would have to be removed to make room for the real