Who is the occupier and
who the occupied? A secret that may not be spoken?
Consider the possibility that the feminists'
claim that patriarchy rules is, at best, a delusion
and at worst a cover story that conceals and distracts
from the power of hidden matriarchy. Hidden
matriarchal rule is women's age-old power expressed
through traditions, norms, commandments and laws while
masquerading as weakness and ultimately victimhood to
protect and extend its control. Like the Colt revolver
of the Old West, is all the new technology the new
equalizer, freeing most people from heavy and risky
Carefully refined deceptions can equal or
surpass physical strengths. Soft deceptions have
always been women's preferred weapon. It can come in
the form of delicate hands cutting a sleeping man's
throat after disarming him with sex, like Judith. Or,
at the other end of the scale it can take the form of
endless talk --political or otherwise--talk that
delays, redefines or, best, totally eliminates
But societies speak to their members in many
ways, including through the hidden language of clues.
Words and images that barely hint at their message.
How powerful the image of the mask using appearance
hides reality. Women simultaneously extend, co-opt and
suppress the true nature of this message by masking
themselves with endless varieties of costuming, makeup
and makeovers. The admitted purpose of masking is to
delay and trap through deceptions.
But key questions are: how far do the deceptions
reach? How much is actually being covered? And how
many unknowing women are being sacrificed to keep this
Who controls whom? Consider the idea that
patriarchy is merely the mask of matriarchy. There is
no Wizard of Oz, just someone maintaining the
illusion, perhaps a witch.
How powerful is the image of the puppet hanging
limp and without purpose or direction on its strings,
until given life, motive and movement by delicate
unseen hands and a falsetto voice.
Words in a falsetto voice have always been the
primary tools of women. Often the fewest of words:
'No'. Softer: 'I don't' feel like it.' Or,more
evasively, 'not tonight--I have a headache.'
A key proof? The world as it is in the U.S.
today. If men as a group are the most monstrous
exploiters of women as feminists say, then the fact
that all men are not rapists or beaters is a tribute
to the real power than inhibits them from acting on
the untamed urges that they are accused of possessing
and acting upon. Words include the law, but the law is
part of the hidden matriarchy, parading as a tool of
men when it is clearly--as seen by its acts--the tool
Could that also apply to the famous male
law-givers of myth, legend and history? Is that the
coded lesson extending from the play LYSISTRATA to the
expression: "Behind every powerful man is a woman."
Cue bono? In law that means "to whose good?" or
"for whose benefit? Although most law enforcers have
been men, in whose behalf have they been acting? Their
own, as a category? Look at the laws and the history
of laws. Laws as a group do not benefit men as a
The laws that give a woman to one man prevent
her from being given over to many men, at once or
serially. Consider: to whose benefit is a rule like
that. Men as a group--or women as a