In this case it's assumed you only drop that potential by using it to create that reality.

Whether a 'therefore' is supposed to connect the first claim with the second, I leave to you. If it doesn't follow logically, it certainly follows emotionally.

In any case, we know the witness is biased.

Because she (generically speaking) is a lesbian cruising for women, with men as her competitors, to help achieve her singular goal she has no choice but to claim that men are monsters.

That's also the right gambit to use when other women are her competitors.

On the other hand, how could any person who loves women (in fact, fantasy and in idea and ideal) not come to hate anyone who does women any harm? The greater the harm, the greater the hate.

But that is an issue of specific cases, not divisive generalizations--unless your goal (as a lesbian) is to divide and conquer.